Editorial Policy & Content Standards
Our commitment to providing accurate, evidence-based oncology information through rigorous medical review and editorial excellence.
Our Editorial Mission
Oncol.net is dedicated to providing medically accurate, current, and accessible oncology information to patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals. We adhere to the highest standards of medical journalism and follow Google's E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) guidelines for health content.
Core Principles
- Accuracy: All content is fact-checked and medically reviewed
- Transparency: Clear attribution and source citations
- Independence: Editorial decisions free from commercial influence
- Timeliness: Regular updates to reflect current medical knowledge
- Accessibility: Clear language without sacrificing accuracy
Content Creation Process
Every piece of content on Oncol.net undergoes a rigorous multi-step process:
Topic Selection & Research
Topics are chosen based on:
- Patient information needs
- Medical importance and relevance
- Current treatment guidelines
- Emerging research findings
Content Development
Written by qualified medical writers who:
- Hold relevant medical or scientific degrees
- Have expertise in oncology communication
- Follow evidence-based guidelines
- Use approved medical terminology
Medical Review
Reviewed by board-certified oncologists who:
- Verify medical accuracy
- Check treatment recommendations
- Ensure guideline compliance
- Validate drug information
Editorial Review
Editors ensure:
- Clarity and readability
- Consistent style and formatting
- Proper source attribution
- Appropriate disclaimers
Fact-Checking
Verification of:
- Statistics and data
- Drug names and dosages
- Clinical trial information
- Reference accuracy
Publication & Monitoring
After publication:
- Content dated and attributed
- Regular review schedule set
- User feedback monitored
- Updates tracked and documented
Medical Review Standards
Medical Reviewer Qualifications
All medical reviewers must meet the following criteria:
Review Criteria
Medical reviewers evaluate content for:
- Clinical Accuracy: Alignment with current medical knowledge
- Guideline Compliance: Consistency with NCCN, ASCO, ESMO guidelines
- Safety: Appropriate warnings and contraindications
- Balance: Fair presentation of treatment options
- Completeness: Comprehensive coverage of topic
Content Standards
Medical Accuracy
- Evidence-based information only
- Current treatment guidelines
- FDA-approved indications
- Peer-reviewed sources
- Clear uncertainty disclosure
Language & Tone
- Clear, accessible language
- Medical terms defined
- Empathetic tone
- No sensationalism
- Cultural sensitivity
Ethical Standards
- Patient privacy respected
- No false hope or promises
- Balanced risk/benefit info
- Clear disclaimers
- No promotion of unproven treatments
Attribution
- Author credentials listed
- Reviewer identification
- Publication date visible
- Last review date shown
- Source citations provided
Source Requirements
Acceptable Sources
Primary Sources
- Peer-reviewed medical journals
- Clinical trial databases (ClinicalTrials.gov)
- FDA announcements and approvals
- Medical conference proceedings
Guidelines & Standards
- NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines
- ASCO Guidelines and Recommendations
- ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines
- NCI Treatment Summaries
- WHO Classifications
Reference Resources
- UpToDate
- Prescribing information (package inserts)
- Medical textbooks (current editions)
- Cochrane Reviews
Note: We do not use press releases, manufacturer marketing materials, or non-peer-reviewed sources as primary references for medical information.
Update Frequency
Content Review Schedule
| Content Type | Review Frequency | Trigger for Immediate Update |
|---|---|---|
| Drug Information | Every 3 months | FDA alerts, new indications |
| Treatment Guidelines | Every 6 months | Guideline updates |
| Cancer Type Pages | Annual | Major research findings |
| Side Effects | Every 6 months | New management strategies |
| Clinical Trials | Quarterly | Trial results published |
| Statistics | Annual | New data releases |
Transparency & Disclosure
What We Disclose
- Author names and credentials
- Medical reviewer identities
- Publication and review dates
- Funding sources (independent)
- Any potential conflicts of interest
- Content update history
- Source citations
Conflict of Interest Policy
All contributors must disclose:
- Financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies
- Research funding sources
- Speaking engagements or consultancies
- Stock ownership in healthcare companies
- Patents or intellectual property
Individuals with significant conflicts are excluded from reviewing content related to those interests.
Corrections & Updates
How We Handle Corrections
- Error Identification: Errors identified through review, user feedback, or monitoring
- Verification: Medical team verifies the error and determines correction
- Correction: Content updated immediately if patient safety involved
- Documentation: Correction noted with date and description
- Notification: Major corrections announced if significant impact
Types of Updates
- Minor Updates: Typos, formatting, clarifications - noted in update log
- Content Updates: New information, guideline changes - dated and described
- Major Revisions: Significant changes - version history maintained
- Corrections: Factual errors - prominently noted with explanation
User Feedback
We value user feedback to improve our content quality and accuracy. Users can:
- Report potential errors or outdated information
- Suggest topics for coverage
- Request clarifications
- Provide feedback on content usefulness
Contact Our Editorial Team
For editorial matters, corrections, or content suggestions:
Email: editorial@oncol.net
We review all feedback and respond within 5 business days.
Advertising & Sponsorship
Oncol.net maintains editorial independence:
- We do not accept pharmaceutical advertising
- Content decisions are never influenced by commercial interests
- No sponsored content or paid placements
- Educational grants, if any, do not influence editorial content
- Clear separation between any future advertising and editorial content
Privacy & Data Protection
Our editorial process respects user and patient privacy:
- No use of identifiable patient information without consent
- Case studies are de-identified or composite
- User data never influences editorial decisions
- Compliance with HIPAA and privacy regulations
See our full Privacy Policy for details.
Compliance & Accreditation
Oncol.net adheres to:
- HONcode principles for health websites
- Google's E-E-A-T guidelines for YMYL content
- FDA regulations on health information
- Medical journalism best practices
- WCAG 2.1 accessibility standards
Disclaimer
This editorial policy is reviewed annually and updated as needed to reflect best practices in medical publishing. Last review: January 24, 2026.